Description

This paper analyzes the scope for systematic rules-based fiscal activism in open economies. Relative to a balanced budget rule, automatic stabilizers significantly improve welfare. But they minimize fiscal instrument volatility rather than business cycle volatility. A more aggressively countercyclical tax revenue gap rule increases welfare gains by around 50 percent, with only modest increases in fiscal instrument volatility. For raw materials revenue gaps the government should let automatic stabilizers work. The best fiscal instruments are targeted transfers, consumption taxes and labor taxes, or, if it enters private utility, government spending. The welfare gains are significantly lower for more open economies.

People who purchased this product also purchased

On Fixed and Variable Fiscal Surplus Rules ($15.00)

Mauritius: 2009 Article IV Consultation - Staff Report; Public Information Notice on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Mauritius ($18.00)

On Fixed and Variable Fiscal Surplus Rules ($15.00)

Taxonomy

Business cycles , Economic development , Economic policy , Economic stabilization , Fiscal policy , Monetary policy

More publications in this series: Working Papers

More publications by: Michael Kumhof ; Douglas Laxton