Description

We analyse optimal discretionary games between a benevolent central bank and a myopic government in a New Keynesian model. First, when lump-sum taxes are available and public debt is absent, we show that a Nash game results in too much government spending and excessively high interest rates, while fiscal leadership reinstates the cooperative outcome under discretion. Second, we show that this familiar result breaks down when lump-sum taxes are unavailable. With government debt, the Nash equilibrium still entails too much public spending but leads to lower interest rates than the cooperative policy, because debt has to be adjusted back to its pre-shock level to ensure time consistency. A setup of fiscal leadership does not avoid this socially costly outcome. Imposing a debt penalty onto the myopic government under either Nash or fiscal leadership raises welfare substantially, while appointing a conservative central bank is less effective.

People who purchased this product also purchased

The Information Content of Money in Forecasting Euro Area Inflation ($18.00)

Reforming Government Subsidies in the New Member States of the European Union ($18.00)

Vacation Over: Implications for the Caribbean of Opening U.S.-Cuba Tourism ($18.00)

Taxonomy

Banks and banking , Central banks , Economic policy , Financial institutions and markets , Fiscal policy

More publications in this series: Working Papers

More publications by: Sven Jari Stehn ; David Vines